The arrogance of left
As I have written before , the left ideology, regardless of the name , forms or country, has a common tread : the idea of entitlement , using any method , lying, cheating, force, just to keep the power with any price. The final aim is to make the country one party state where “the big brother” (see Orwell) knows better what is good for you. With the power comes the corollary – the arrogance, meaning that from he moment you have power , you can do whatever you please in the interest of “the party”, disregarding the needs of the people or of the entire country. Any one who will want – unfortunately they are very few – to understand the arrogance of left , ought to read any book related to the rise and fall of the Soviet empire or any other similar to it, like China, North Korea, Cuba, former Cambodia, to give you just a few examples. In a few words I will try to present my opinion by the end of the presidential term. I am writing this from a Canadian angle , especially because that a lot of young Canadians, without a logical justification have been obsessed with USA’s last election admiring the president Nr.44 despite of his lack of accomplishments in all areas. The followings are not new, original, everything can be found on webs , if one likes to find it, and not to be deceived by superficial leftist propaganda.
If someone will comment that what is written here is not “original” in this case let me quote few lines from one of my very old “intellectual friend” – Blaise Pascal: “Don’t say that I have said nothing new. The arrangement is new. At tennis both players use the same ball, but one places it better.”
The arrogance of America leftist leadership
During her short history America had various presidents with various qualities or defects, but arrogance appeared for the first time within her Democrat party , starting with JFK who, without any specific intellectual qualities, but with enormous wealth and sex appeal , almost established a “democratic dynasty”. The Kennedy clan used for the first time idea of “dynastic entitlement”, as after the death of JFK to be anointed his brother Robert, the arrogance going so far that it was an intention to install as president an alcoholic and alleged killer and liar , just because was a member of that clan. Due to money and smart propaganda, even today it is some of nostalgia related to “Kennedy’s time” which doesn’t have any substance.
But the more obvious arrogance was established with the inauguration of the 44th President, in 2008. Nobody in the left communities will agree that his main advantage to be elected was his skin colour. Why? Because for many years after the WWII , America had the same “guilt complex” as Germany had after the fall of Nazi . Both these countries, Germany and USA, are under the spellbound of a “guilt complex”. In the first case we can find an easy explanation because the racial horror under Nazi policy was not perpetrated by the members of Nazi party or SS only, but it was up – to a certain extent– a national complicity, The after war generations, whilst not totally justified , wanted to pay for the sins of their parents. Through exaggerations Germany is on he verge to loose its national identity in order to please the ridiculous idea of politically correctness. Sadly enough, in the area occupied by communism, which produced more victims than any other social calamities , this guilt complex did not take place but it was seriously suppressed.
In USA, mutatis mutandis, took place quite the same phenomenon.
The younger generations , influenced by some fallacious leftist ideology, pretending to be righteous , jumped on anti racist train claiming mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, for the past slavery used by the previous older generations. The institution of chattel slavery – the treatment of slaves as property, a real unjustified human tragedy, lasted 246 years, not hundreds as is used by some and out of total slavery in the New World, just 4 to 6% of total slaves have been in USA, the rest of the victims were sent to Brazil and Caribbean. (See Daina Ramey Berry- Univ.of Texas. Today’s generation ought to understand that they are not purveyors or inheritors of all Americans because “roughly 25% of all southerners owned slaves. The fact that one quarter of the Southern population were slaveholders is still shocking to many. This truth brings historical insight to modern conversations about the Occupy Movement, its challenge to the inequality gap and its slogan we are the 99%.”
Fortunately, in the last half of the century until 2008, USA evolved in a right direction and, in my opinion, was very close to be “colour blind” in the race area. We can learn the history but we cannot change it. Who is intentionally bent to change the history will have as affect to destroy the present. Unfortunately , today the history , the real one, is carefully avoided. Without checking his curriculum vitae and his intellectual and professional preparedness, Americans voted in power the number 44 mostly out of guilt complex. Due to the crass uncultured vulgus and with the complicity of leftist mass media totally sold to internationalist unpatriotic ideas, the future #44 was elected mostly based on his skin colour even nobody paid attention to his family and educational background, easily to be checked. Reading his book published in 1995 Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance we can find out that his father, a Kenyan, was not very much in love with his new country and after few years “he returned to Kenya to fulfill his promise to his nation.” We can ask now, what influence the father had on his son , even remotely, when “his nation” was Kenya? It is not the future president’s fault that he had to live in a Muslim country. But his first childhood formative educational years were in a Muslim environment which is not , by far, close to America’s traditional culture emerged from Europe. Anybody could find out very easily that he “was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta. (Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world.) We also have to respect the biographic information that his “American mother, rejected organized religion, according to several accounts. Obama has summed up his own faith history by saying he didn’t grow up in any particular religious tradition” Later on he declared that he is Christian, although we cannot recall any Christian public manifestation of his. The most important mentions of his Christianity was the attendance for many years to some anti white sermons delivered by a hysterical , racist , anti-American pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a well known socialist who hates everything America stands for. That is why he screamed “God Damn America” in that infamous uncovered sermon during the 2008 campaign. I have to also mention his unfortunate comparison between crimes committed today by the Islamic fundamentalists and the time of crusaders who fought to liberate Jerusalem violently occupied by Muslims. Another aspect of his biography is his obvious inclination towards leftism, socialism or, how he said “spreading the wealth”
{Moreover, there are four excellent books out that detail Obama’s Marxist background and how communists and socialists completely dominate his administration: The Manchurian President: Barack Obama’s Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists, by Aaron Klein; The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, the Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor, by Paul Kengor; Barack Obama and the Enemies Within, by Trevor Loudon; and Radical-In-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism, by Stanley Kurtz.} Fromm all these published books we can learn the followings about the 44th president: In Obama’s own biography, he says his main mentor from early teenager hood to 18 was Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Communist Party leader (Party #47544) who hated everything America stood for. Davis was involved in espionage against the West, as his FBI file indicates. Obama launched his first campaign with a fundraiser at Bill Ayers house, the same Bill Ayers of Weather Underground terrorist, who calls himself a “small c communist.” While at Occidental College, Obama travelled in the same circles as Dr. John Drew, a well known communist activist on campus. Drew says that Obama “was a Marxist-Leninist in his Sophomore year of college….” He also relates that Obama was far more radical than he actually supported a violent communist revolution in USA. In his biography, Obama says that, during college, he was attracted to “Marxists professors.” Indeed, he attended “Socialist Scholars Conferences” , in 1983 and 1984. Once out of college, Obama worked for and with a number of groups associated or founded by Saul Alinsky, a nationally renowned socialist community organizer. The Communist Party USA called Obama “a friend” and has boasted that many of those around him have communist backgrounds. Obama was very close to Communist Party leaders Addie Wyatt, Vernon Jarrett, and Bea Lumpkin. The Communist Party actively campaigned for Obama’s 2004 U.S. Senate race and for his 2008 presidential race and wrote a glowing endorsement of Obama in its People’s Weekly World newspaper. Sam Webb, the former President of the U.S. Communist Party, announced in 2009 that “We now have not simply a friend, but a people’s advocate in the White House.” Many of Obama’s speeches contain classic socialist economic themes: demonizing the “rich,” claiming businessmen “didn’t build” their businesses, “wealth redistribution,” and his belief that government spending creates jobs. For me is a sign of arrogance to pretend to love America, having such a solid leftist pedigree, considering that they, the leftists, by definition are internationalists. He is a result of a lethal concoction of leftist , anarchist, Marxist ideology on a nuanced Muslim background . However another aspect of arrogance was the claim of his professorship. In reality, as is stated by Karin McQuillan, “Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer. He did not have the qualifications to be a professor. Obama never published a single law paper. He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard. There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on. This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer” But the word “professor” sounds arrogantly much better, more impressive in the eyes of the innocents,. The first sign of arrogance which I noticed, was a short time after his election when a reporter trying to make him to give some more concise answered he replied to the effect that I am president I can speak as long as I like. Moreover we should not forget his attitude of “imperial presidency” when he stated that he can accomplish his plan to change America, using the pen and the phone, which he did issuing many, many executive orders which, fortunately, after the end of his tenure, will be cancelled. Unfortunately the thousands of hours playing golf and campaigning without any justification, but using citizens’ taxes, doing nothing productive for America – never can be overturned. When the future president, Trump, asserted that Obama will go down in history as the most inefficient president, with the arrogance of one who was sure that Hillary Clinton will be elected, defiantly replied publicly: but I will go down as president, implying that Trump will loose. Big error of judgment, and not he first one.
But he is very persistent, even breaking the American’s tradition that the outgoing president should keep quiet. Not Obama. Referring to the Trump’s future presidency, recently he declared:.. “If there are issues that have less to do with the specifics of some legislative proposal or battle, but go to core questions about our values and our ideals, and if I think that it’s necessary or helpful for me to defend those ideals, then I’ll examine it when it comes.” What values? Spread the wealth and leave 13 trillions debt? What ideals? Of his fathers and his mentors who despised America? I presume that in his parallel universe he thinks that he is a sort of referendarius de democratia , or a deus ex machina in case of national crises. In reality, during his eight years, Obama did his best to divide Americans by race and income. He will remain in the very short memory of history as a very polite, exemplary family man and with ability to deliver very smoothly speeches written by others and read by him on the prompter. The arrogance got roots in his family. The first Lady, with very deep genetically roots in America, after the election had me astonished when he declared that because her husband was first black president, for the first time she felt being proud to be American.!!! Very recently, because the aggressive liberal leftists loss she astonished us again declaring – to another fake American that she feels America doesn’t have now any…hope!
The arrogance of Hollywood
Outside of the fact that LaLa land produces a lot of dollars making movies, in the last few decades most of them without any artistic value, Hollywood excels in ignorance. Although a lot of so called “stars” (because they are not really actors, artists) are filthy rich, yet they are propagandists of perverted leftist idea, because is a new fashions. It will be justified to have your own opinion if you have some knowledge of the subject. But the tragedy is that most of them are dropped outs from schools and, as one can suspect, some of them have an IQ almost at the same value with their shoes’ size. Even worse is their public exhibitionism against the essence of American values, disrespect of their own country. Some believe that if one played in a move the character of the president, in real life he will be competent to make stern opinions about constitution. According to the day’s fashion , these Harlequins pretend to be specialists in climate, presidential election, international affairs, etc. omitting their lack of education and culture. Playing a doctor in a movie’s hospital, doesn’t make one a real Ben Carson.
The arrogance of UN
This strange association of all countries, each one with different culture, tradition and culture not even remotely similar to each other and controlled by a few nations extremely rich but not interested in peace and human unity, became an expensive farce. This amorphous society started to have the arrogance of deciding what is good or bad, what is proper or not in he area of international relations with a total impotent results. Interestingly enough this UN never moved a finger , not to stop, but at least to alleviate the tragedy of soviet terror inside of USSR and outside, to stop the communist butchery in Hungary, Czechoslovakia and the rest of “soviet influence”, in China of Mao’s cultural revolution, Cambodia, Cuba, etc. The most recent example is “voting” a resolution , with US blessing, against Israel, the only real democracy in that area, to impose some arrangements which will be beneficial not to the peace but to a group of known international terrorists. It is proper to say that UN is like a bunch of mosquitos trying to show that they are eagles. Somebody very wise, recently proposed a very good solution: the UN building to be transformed in a useful condos.
The danger of arrogance in Canada
As long as Canada was colony or dominion, we had some arrogance coming from centuries of nobility tradition. Although with a Royal pedigree , Canada evolved in a very democratic way, being more republican than USA despite of the fact that our head of state was a King or now is a Queen. An evident equality was and it is obvious at all level of our society. Unfortunately the virus of socialism , insidiously started to settle in our social and political life, under disguise of “liberalism”. The following lines are not intended to be a compendium of a liberal party or liberalism in Canada.
After more than two decades of liberal governing under Mackenzie King , a man with a complicated biography which must be read by the new generation in love with “leftism”, after awhile we had 11 years of P.E.Trudeau government which move Canada strongly to the more left without any benefit for our nation. Pierre was also an unusual ideological mixture as it is president #44. This time amid a very large culture he was attached to Stalinist model of society, very close friend with another genocidal killer, Castro and he had also elements of dogmatic Catholicism, Quebec nationalism and internationalism. Very strange, indeed. Due to his influential oratorical skill and a very complacent electorate he was in power long time, enough to consolidate his party with new comers reducing the citizenship waiting time from five years to three. Trudeau visited the Siberian city of Norilsk and lamented that Canada had never succeeded in building so large a city so far north – unaware, or unconcerned, that Norilsk had been built by slave labor of political prisoners. Trudeau describes his meeting with the Communist leaders like this: “… It is a stirring moment: these graybeard, in their ripe old age, embody today the triumph of an idea, an idea that has turned the whole world upside down and profoundly changed the course of human history.” Of the graybeard who has murdered more than 30 million Chinese, Trudeau says: ” Mao Tse-tung, one of the great men of the century” Trudeau not only justifies Mao Tse-tung’s mass murders – he applauds them. They are good, he says. They are necessary. They prove Mao’s genius. Trudeau lavishly admired Fidel Castro, and other Third World dictators. It’s telling I think that Trudeau came to the edge of endorsing the communist coup against Solidarity in Poland in December Hours after the coup, Pierre Trudeau said: “If martial law is a way to avoid civil war and Soviet intervention, then I cannot say it is all bad.” He is also a founder of a multicultural Canada, dislodging the country from its European cultural roots as we have now hyphenated Canadians , not just simple Canada.
With the power handed to him by Canadian ignoramus in connivance with other crypto communists , came the arrogance, expressed by his infamous “just watch me” or disrespecting the Queen making a pirouette behind her during a very solemn time, the repatriation of DNA – our Constitution.
After a hiatus in our way towards “liberal socialism”, it was started a new “democratic dynasty , that of Trudeaus’. Similarly to USA, Canadian populace voted for a good looking young guy who promised free cannabis and made a strong courtship to some minorities in order to “pose” as a humanist with the interest of minorities in his heart, acting histrionically during some minorities’ parades and promising everything which can be promised. Unfortunately, our electorate, similarly with that of USA did not pay any attention to his curriculum vitae to see his qualifications and economic experience as he worked a little as a teacher completed one year of an engineering program at Montreal before quitting and in 2005 he began a master degree in environmental geography but again quit after one year. After one year in power, the new Liberal government under the Trudeau Nr. 2 we have a budgetary deficit of 29 billions and a promise of free cannabis. With a typical arrogance related to his name, our PM embraces various causes apparently in a total painful ignorance related to those subjects, appoints ministers based on sex and not qualification, arrogantly justifying that “because we are in 2016”. It also appeared under the insidious leftist demagoguery, a new type of arrogance which I would call it “arrogance from within”.
With the aspect of ghettoization the idea of being just Canadian is diluted and pushed aside and some minorities try to become entities, in contradiction with our constitution and history. They start modestly with claim for an unusual religion freedoms – which they very liberally got it – after that asking for application in their communities (ghettos) of their old countries customs and traditional laws, etc. On top of these ghettos, because of a misunderstood and forced applied liberalism, some Canadians have considered themselves above others and claim to be “first nations”. The simple question is: how many “nations “ Canada could have? Because reading our pre-colonial History nobody could find any society, a “nation” with some code of Laws, not necessary like one of Justinian, or a common language or currency.
If someone asserts that “our strength consists in our diversity”, that someone lives in a parallel universe.
It is my strong opinion that under the arrogant leftist leadership , our Canada is going to become a collection on various national ghettos under the pretence of inclusiveness and due to the fallacious globalization‘ s pressure accepted by liberalism and against the future which Canada fully deserves.
We have to understand that under no circumstances arrogance is a virtue. It can become the reason of social calamity.
Johannes de Silentio
FREE EXILED 