Blog

#51-Political somnambulism

                 POLITICAL SOMNAMBULISM

 The very recent terrorist attack in Manchester, where 22 people have been killed and more than one hundred injured, inbred in Islamic terrorism promoted by ISIS, made me think again that we, civilized world, due to the ineptitudes nurtured by political correctness, liberalism, progressivism, globalism, etc., are living in a time of a political somnambulism.                                                                                                                                        And when I said “we”, I obviously refer to our emasculated leaders who, in a perfect denial regarding the danger of that terrorism, compete in a common concert in declaring the same platitudes repeated after each act of terror but in fact doing nothing and let us to be victims of barbarism. Look to just a few examples identically printed after each atrocities: -“Please keep the victims & their families in your thoughts.” Canada                    “Our thoughts go out to the victims of the Manchester attack and their families.” Italy -“Germany stands by your side.” – Merkel , chancellor who open the flood gate of Europe to a false refugee crise.                                                                                                                                “-All our thoughts are with the victims and the families of those who have been affected,” said May of UK who, at the approaching election, she might lose.

In the same time, the terrorists, with a free and easy access to the electronic media, in jubilation posted their hate towards us, civilized nations: “the beginning is in Brussels and Paris, and in London we form a state,” meaning ISIS.

This symptom of political somnambulism is so deeply entrenched in the brains of leftist politicians and media which supports them, as such they refuse to acknowledge that these acts of terror are the result of their own makings: multiculturalism with social elements devoid of culture and incapable of being assimilated in our civilization, globalization which dissipates all the national characteristics which are replaced with barbaric traditions, and its corollary of cancellation of all the borders which facilitates free movement of various hoards of terrorists and , above all, hiding their social and political impotence behind a ludicrous notion of political correctness which nobody can intelligently define.

Due to very well organized leftist propaganda a good part of populace cannot understand the danger and continue to vote in power the same somnambul demagogues with a disastrous effect to the future of our civilization and culture.

We also notice a defeatism disguised as pacifism from those ignorant in their own history and infected by laziness as such not to stand and defend themselves. The best example is the former “hippy” movement (“make love not wars”!!!) which produced hollywoodian characters like Hanoi Jane or today Madonna.

A branch of pacifism is also practiced by some Christians. Those who maintain that it is enough to pray and to proclaim the faith in Jesus will accomplish nothing except appeasement . Recently Obama was hailed as a new (political) Messiah and look where the world is now.                                                                                                                                     I have an utmost respect for the belief similar to the first Christians of catacombs . If the entire Christianity will kneel  and  pray , the barbarian will win. In 12th century Jerusalem would not have been liberated for one hundred years if Christians would have resumed their fight to prayers only.                                                                                                                            In order  for Christianity to survive, we have to pay attention to that passage from the Bible (John 2:15) where is stated : And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables;

Middle way or middle solution doesn’t exist. 

The present road of defeatism and appeasement is paved with lawyers who are ministers of defense or with ministers selected based not on merit but on the skin colour and national background, some even not respecting the uniform and the flag.                          The brave military personnel who can win in any battle cannot fight because they are corseted in various idiotic rules as how not to have “collateral damages” or how to protect enemy’s traditions and habits as such in the last almost 20 years the terrorism flourishes and expands.

We have to learn from the history of Sparta, as an example, where the fighters where taught by their mothers, before the battle : “Another woman handed her son his shield, and exhorted him: Son, either with this or on this.” (Plutarch)                                                                  Now, in Hollywood , female clowns like Madonna dreams to kill the president.

In this time of political somnambulism the politicians masquerading in leaders , between saving their countries, culture and civilization or to impose the “political correctness” they prefer the last one, even they cannot explain what it is.                                                          Our legal systems created to protect us are so edulcorated that we read ineptitudes like: we cannot arrest them because they did not YET committed any crime. We cannot spread the country with preventive camps like in Guantanamo.                                                                                 Between seeing children butchered by terrorist acts and seeing some Guantanamo camps , it will be better for everyone Guantanamo sites.

We defeat ourselves because we let somnambulists to take care of our lives, culture and civilization and we do not elect statesmen with love for the country in lieu of politicians in love with their party’s interests.

When we will wake up, it will be too late.

Manchester and other tragedies are just a preamble to what is coming.

Johannes de Silentio

 

 

 

 

 

 

#50 – FAITH? Which one?

             FAITH ? WHICH ONE?

 As a result of European religious wars and persecutions , the first inhabitants of the New World legally evolved as such now, in USA and Canada as well we have a full protection of religions, sometimes using the term of “faith”.

If one will carefully read American constitution, especially what Jefferson wrote about this subject or Canadian Charter of Rights will notice the best intentions to protect that aspect of freedom but one can also observes that these legal documents do not clarify, in fact, what religion means.                                                                                                                Strictly linguistic the definition is very simple: “a particular system of faith and worship.”

Former Chief Justice Brian Dickson wrote that the religion freedom includes “the right to entertain such religious beliefs as a person chooses, the right to declare religious beliefs openly and without fear of hindrance or reprisal, and the right to manifest religious belief by worship and practice or by teaching and dissemination.”                                                          In another case, our Supreme Court in a majority found freedom of religion encompasses a right to religious practices “”if the individual has a n their sincere belief that the practice is connected to religion.”                                                                                                                   I have a full respect for the learnt minds of our Justices but such interpretations open a flood gate of a lot of aberrations disguised in religions. In this day and age full of political correctness some aberrations or acts against our culture and civilization are defended under the pretences presented as “our faith”.

If we will apply what in logic is called reduction ad absurdum, do we have to accept a “religion “ which believes in human sacrifices?                                                                                  A lot of former civilizations practiced human sacrifices. What will it be if some descendants of those civilization will claim revival of their ancestor faith?

Currently human sacrifice is very rare and almost non-existent in modern India. However, there have been at least 3 cases through 2003–2013 where 3 men have been murdered in the name of human sacrifice implying the practice may still be ongoing in greater numbers in the unpoliced slums.  The Maya held the belief that cenotes or limestone sinkholes were portals to the underworld and sacrificed human beings and tossed them down the cenote to please the water god Chaa The Aztecs were particularly noted for practicing human sacrifice on a large scale Human sacrifice was common in West African states up to and during the 19th century                                                                      In March 2010, a 26-year-old labourer in Bangladesh was killed by fellow workers on the orders of the owners after a fortune teller suggested that a human sacrifice would yield highly prized red bricks

This type of “faith “ is found also within tribes of so called “first nations”. The Pawnee practiced an annual Morning Star Ceremony, which included the sacrifice of a young girl. Though the ritual continued, the sacrifice was discontinued in the 19th century. The Iroquois are said to have occasionally sent a maiden to the Great Spirit.

If descendants of nations who believed in human sacrifices will today desire to revive their “religion” will our justices will agree with them based on their “sincere belief that the practice is connected to religion.”?                                                                                                         It is not clear why we intend to persecute the polygamy when the culprits declare their sincere faith in it?                                                                                                                                   Moreover we, civilized society, based on this notion of “sincere belief” of others whom are so easily accepted without a serious vetting, , should not be revolted if in Canada is practiced female genital mutilation or the wife beating, because everything is based on belief approved by some ideological writing.                                                                                {There is some evidence to indicate that FGM is practised in Ontario and across Canada among immigrant and refugee communities. FGM is considered child assault and prohibited under sections 267 (assault causing bodily harm) or 268 (aggravated assault, including wounding, maiming, disfiguring) of the Criminal Code. But all these sections contradict and are used in defence with what the justice considered “sincere belief}

In Canada (and in USA as well) it is made a serious effort to protect all animals.        However we have in store meat from animals killed in a certain religious way which is a form of slaughtering animals involving killing through a cut to the jugular vein, carotid artery and windpipe. … Animals must be alive and healthy at the time of slaughter and all blood is drained from the carcass.(quote from a “religious book”  )                         One, including any of justices , ought not to be vegetarian to be revolted by this form of barbarism.

Using the same argument reduction ad absurdum , Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot can justify their atrocities based on their “sincere” belief in their “religion” which was Marxism, atheism.

I suspect that our judicial system represented by a new generation of justices–not only in Canada- is barren of the traditional principles inherited from centuries and is replaced with a branch of judicial correctness, if I may called it, as such in a veil way to accept anything under the general flag of politically correctness.                                                              The diluted legal system doesn’t understand that it not protects real religions but is aloof of an infiltration of alien ideologies totally in defiance with our civilization and culture.

And this infiltration has a very obvious intention to destroy our existing system and replace it with something which, compering with ours, is barbaric, anacronic.

Johannes de Silentio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

# 49 A French Oedipus

           A FRENCH OEDIPUS

Our Canadian intelligentsia and academia in cahoots with a socialism infested journalism, jumped with an unparalleled fury against today’s US President, although it was not our business or area of interest.

Looking to the recent French presidential election I wonder why the same intelligentsia did not comment anything about Macron and his strange family.

Trump was attacked as sexist, disrespectful to women, but nobody explains the “affair d’amour” which come s quite close to paedophilia or, if you like it, to so called “Oedipus complex” which is a sexual relation between the child and the mother, like in Sophocles tragedy from fifth centuries BC.

It is known that a conscious adult mind is a moral factor which fights against this complex. Freud considered the reactions against the Oedipus complex the most important social achievements of the human mind.

A French academic, Foucault has stated in 1978 :“It could be that the child, with his own sexuality, may have desired that adult, he may even have consented, he may even have made the first moves. We may even agree that it was he who seduced the adult. But we specialists with our psychological knowledge know perfectly well that even the seducing child runs a risk, of being damaged and traumatized. (…) Consequently, the child must be ‘protected from his own desires’, even when his desires turn him towards an adult”.

In case of Macron family the French society and its legal system did not protect a 15 years boy as not to have that “affaire d’amour” with a woman 25 years his senior.     Seems to me that the French morality is very permissive and we will never know, in this generation what was the case of Macron’s family.

In the book Women Who Sexually Abuse Children: From Research to Clinical Practice, it is stated that: “Women who sexually abuse children can be of any age, social class, intellectual ability, and marital status, and can be involved in any type of employment….”

The case of Macron pair is a perfect example.

I recently realized that not Greeks from antiquity  discovered “Oedipus complex”, analyzed ad nauseam by psychologists because is very much in fashion to have a Bachelor in psychology and to pretend that sexually obsessed, Freud, is right.                The only moment when I understood what psychology is about was when I heard the very empiric explanation given by Crocodile Dundee, if you remember the movie.             I also believe that Sophocles was not competent enough to theatrically write about  Oedipus .

Carl Jung explains very well that …”At the core of any mother complex is the mother archetype, which means that behind emotional associations with the personal mother, both in men and in women, there is a collective image of nourishment and security on the one hand (the positive mother.”  For this reason I stated that Macron as a victim of complex , looked to his beloved Brigitte as a motherly symbol.

I also realized that Sophocles was not competent enough to theatrically write about  Oedipus . As a matter of fact this theatrical subject should have been approached during the French Classicism by Racine and Corneille.  Maybe better by the comedian Moliere  if we will look to the result of French presidential election.

From my modest legal education I knew  that  in Napoleonic penal code has been mentioned paedophilia as a crime. Seems to me I was mistaken because in 19th century , the age of “consent” was dropped to 15. Therefore the mother symbol could not be guilty. Macron , when he was 15 years old entered  in an “affair d’amour” cu Madame professeur  Brigitte , his senior with  a mere 25  years,  and in the same class with one of her daughters! Seems to me that the idea of paedophilia did not  apply in that time, as I mentioned before.

Now, when he is 39 years old  is Monsieur President and she, at 64 (!!) is first lady of France

On top of this old Oedipal situation he is step father of 3 children quite the same age with his own age and step grandfather of seven children while she is a grandma from children of her children which are the same age with her husband!

I have to stop here because I am totally confused and even Oedipus is amused by this unusual history which might be a comedy  but it is  to immoral to laugh.

An immoral act is difficult to describe and it is related to the history of society. But in this case the act is so obvious than only liberals could not comprehend.

The French electorate is totally aloof as it is ours when comes to the basic interests and principles of our Canadian civilization and culture.

And our academia and intelligentsia did not comment   anything about the French comedic presidential election because we have to respect and protect our bilingualism.

But to attack conservatives or Trump , any abjection is permissible, because it is not French.

Therefore vive la libéralisme and le bilinguisme.

 

#48 DIVIDED WE STAND

                  DIVIDED WE STAND

The last news related to Conservative leadership’s election, the fact that Kevin O’Leary dropped out, shows once more that what we call my beloved Canada  is a fiction , it is not a real country. Her Majesty dominion is formed out of two solitudes: Canada proper as an extension of  Anglo Saxon culture and civilization and the second one , based on French immigrants, never happy on the new land and never willing to assimilate, who tried to create their own country with a new French identity.

Due to the impressive size of the British empire, even after the start of its slow dissolution, this new nation called itself Quebec, although the name is not at all French.

The O’Leary “case” proves that the liberalism in Canada is interested in maintaining power only and not at all in making the country more prosperous. Regardless of anyone’s opinion about O’Leary, to replace meritocracy with dynastic democracy based on the fiction called bilingualism is not only risible but detrimental to the country itself. The French language is beautiful and the culture born from it is extremely important in our European heritage.

As a former bilingual myself I have a great respect for uniquity of the French culture and a regret that I lost the fluency of that language.

However , a country cannot progress based on division.

And this division is a result of a perverse leftist ideology which has the main aim of controlling a nation using that old Latin divide et impera, but not the military force.     That strange ideological concoction of Marxism, Stalinism, Jansenism and liberal internationalism which was called P.E.Trudeau is the main cause of the language friction and inequality which today burdens and eliminated meritocracy in favour of various lunacies which dominate our government and political structure.                                     Pierre Trudeau, enacted the first Official Languages Act in 1969 and entrenched detailed protections for the two official languages in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982. He did not do it for the love of Canada, because he was an internationalist of the Comintern mold. He was also not interested in developing French culture which was proved when he crushed FLQ activity. He understood that through his measure he will control 25% of Canada and liberals, using Quebec’s electorate, will always be “king makers”. The aim of Trudeau’s activity was to make Canada one party state where the central government will control our lives to the smallest detail as did one of his idols, Stalin. Isn’t Pierre who allegedly said, looking to the area named Vorkuta of the former Soviet Union, location of tens of extermination camps and where millions perished: here started the future….

Is Canada in fact a “bilingual country”?

Reading the government statistics one can be in a serious doubt. In Quebec, about 42.6 percent of the population (3,328,725 people) report knowing both languages; , in the rest of Canada, in 2006 only about 10.2 percent (2,430,990) of the population had a knowledge of both of the country’s official languages. From the same statistics we found that  Inuktitut is also an official language in Nunavut. The Northwest Territories accords official status to nine aboriginal languages. If we add various dialects of various tribes, Canada looks like a base for an experimental Esperanto invented in the late 19th century It will be wonderful to have all Canadians speaking Shakespeare’s and Voltaire’s languages. Reality is totally different and we have MD in hospital speaking an uncertain official language and a lot of academics lecturing at universities in a doubtful language but with a strong leftist convictions.                                                                                                           I suspect that not bilingualism is important for liberals but the control of electorate.           In Canada one statesman could have an IQ higher than Einstein but if is not French speaking he is useless. Unfortunately if a politician speaks a very problematic English he or she can go to the highest level of government if he/she speaks French.

Pierre Eliot applied the Latin principle of divide and impera but not using the military force as Romans did. The idea was to control parts in order to dominate the entire country. The junior , was elected not based on his proven experience in some area at least , or based on some peculiar intellectual prowess combined with oratorical skill, but exclusively on the idea of dynastic democracy, good look, expensive hair cut and perfect bilingualism. He pushes Canada to an intense ghettoization when he ridiculously asserts that “our diversity is our strength”!?                                                                                                 This blatant historical ignorance opened the flood gates of invasion under the guise of “immigration” and “refugees” with less than minimal vetting. Canada is waiting to be a social victim of migration as Europe is. How will we enforce the bilingualism with false refugees from countries at all able to be assimilated into our civilization and culture? In order to secure more votes for idea of “liberalism” and “globalization” we let a future Trojan horse of terrorism to establish a strong foothold waiting for a proper time to struck and destroy our civilization.

In the same time the pleas of Christians in some parts of Middle East where they are butchered to the verge of extinction , are ignored .

For inept politicians any aberration has to be protected if it is declared “a culture” or “a faith”. Yours truly, was shocked finding a female doctor in a hospital who could not do a physical examination because was against “her faith” to touch a male body!

That old “hyphenated Canadian” evolved in a total ghettoes when in a big cities have East Asian , Hindu or Muslim , Somali ,Vietnamese, etc, areas refusing to go into mainstream of Canadian civilization some of them even imposing their barbaric customs and habits. And this on top of another foolishness named “first nations” which our total ghettoization.

In a perfect world (which we are not in) will be absolutely normal that Quebec to be a separate country which people richly deserve and the rest of Canada to continue its European roots, to be a country with one real culture and not a conglomerate of phantasies called “cultures” or “religions”

In this perfect world the liberalism will not have any reason to exist and these lunacies named globalization, inclusiveness , climate change , multilingualism ejusdem farinae will disappear for the benefit of Canada.

This is exactly what liberals refuse to accept and invent anything in order to make Canada one party state , a dream of a certain political dynasty and of other leftist ignoramus.

Johannes de Silentio

 

 

# 47 – UNDER ATTACK

                UNDER ATTACK

 Initially I intended to name   this posting as “under pressure” referring to our civilization’s Judeo Christian roots. But after the most recent attacks against churches in Egypt I realised that using politically correctness is moot. The crude reality is that Christianity as a whole is under attack, and the response of our civilised world is not anymore a simple appeasement but a total capitulation.                                                                    We witness a tragically painful result of a political decay due to a global ignorance manifested by the leaders of the civilised world who, how they came in power, remains a total mystery to me.

I presume that Lenin (and Stalin as well), if they will be alive , will be very delighted to see how the idea of proletarian internationalism , where people suppose not to have any allegiance to their country but to their international movement , succeeded without any fight.

The civilization capitulates.

The perfect example , in the worst sense of the word, is represented by Frau Angela Merkel who, perversely using the power given to her by this inventive, resilient and extremely hard-working nation, brought Germany to the edge of a social abyss.        Although a declared Christian, in a very twisted way she developed an European policy which will have as a result the disappearing of German traditional Christian culture in favour of a new, aggressive ideology which she is oblivious  and total ignorant of.           After it was rightfully pointed out that her inept policy to open the borders to millions of migrants not related in any way to the idea of persecuted refugees and nobody knows how many of them have been infiltrators of ISIS, she publicly declared that Germany suffers not from “too much Islam” but “too little Christianity”.                                                          If she will not be obsessed by her image of the saviour of aggressive migrants in a strange interpretation of the Christianity she should take a look to her country’s ancient history. And learn something from it.

I refer to the battle of he Teutonic Forest during the year 9th when Germanic tribes totally destroyed Roman legions and after that Romans never tempted to attack again that territory. If Germanic people would have acted like today’s Frau Angela, Germany would never existed and with it never we would had Bach, Brahms, Mozart, Beethoven, Goethe, Schiller, etc.

This sort of Pharisaic Christianity performed in other countries –especially Scandinavian- but in France as well, proves that the politically emasculated western politicians are not able to distinguish between religion and racist violent ideology including everything in a new ludicrous word “globalization” which nobody can reasonable define, unless will copy Lenin.

They do not understand that the Renaissance with all its great creators is a result of some national cultures, Italian, French, English, German, etc ., and not a fictitious “global” creators and all our European cultural development emerged under Judeo Christian tradition as an extension of the ancient culture.

In their blind ignorance they cannot see that ISIS type of ideology will not develop anything but destroy everything because ISIS ancestors, as far as I know, never produced a Beethoven, a Shakespeare , a Tolstoy or an Ibsen. In their rabid anti-Semitism ideology ISIS considers Christianity as an extension of Judaism and therefore has to be totally destroyed.

And , yet, politicians do not see the danger and open the countries’ gates to let anyone in. The new leftist ideology which flooded our social life doesn’t produce anything positive, but chaos and hate. Our countries can be developed including various colour of skin, black, white, brown, yellow, etc., but they will implode if all members of our societies will not agree to be part of one national culture.

Karl Marx, writes in Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right :” Religion…it is the opium for the people.”

Our countries’ fathers, in their wisdom as not to be repeated the mistakes of a dogmatic extremist Christianity , legislated a total separation between Church and State, leaving in place some basic religious traditional belief manifested in official oath, the ten commandments , Lord Prayer, etc . They are part of a social package to show one allegiance to our Country’s traditions as it is respect for the flag, anthem, Queen, etc Unfortunately we had a new ideological fallacy , named “atheism” which infested our politicians who want to prove their independence from any religion.                                  Without making any dichotomy to be atheist became a new religion because is a belief in nothing.

Somehow while any form or residue of Christianity is eliminated, with a strange inconsistency and with an obvious bias against Christianity , our governments let seeping through forms of various religious ideology in contradiction with the principle of separation.                                                                                                                                                    It was accepted in schools a certain form of weapons to appease a minority, modify our basic national symbols, like military uniform , for the same reason, facilitate special spaces in school or other places where to be performed daily prays , accepted in schools visits from some sort of shamans to show traditional spiritual/religion ancestries, etc.,

On the line of transforming Canada in a conglomerate of various national, cultural and religious ghettoes some pseudo legal minds are ready to accept , in some areas of some ghettoes, to be applied a different set of Laws in a total contradiction with our traditional Common law and separation’s principle.

The most recent blow against our civilization and tradition is accepting , without a very strong vetting, a lot of people under the pretence of refugees – and not landed immigrants – and we cannot check if those are Christians systematically butchered in name of ISIS ideology or some are just infiltrators from he same category which has as an aim the extermination of Christian faith.

A very wise friend for whom I have a great respect being an example of a pillar of our society, recently wrote to me that he will do his pat, praying for surviving of the Christian faith.                                                                                                                                                                   His intention is very commendable. But to save our traditional culture and civilization we will need much more than to pray.

And not with the present leaders and politicians.

I wish to everyone, including atheists a Happy Easter and Happy Passover as well.

 Johanes de Silentio

 

#46 To Vote : CANADA

                          TO VOTE : CANADA

 The very ugly mob events in USA against the office of the President, whomever is he, must show us that whatever political tendency we have, the office of monarchic representative ought to be respected. The person is irrelevant. The symbol permanently is .                                                                                                                                                In my previous 3 postings about liberalism looking comparative with a conservatism I did not mention the liberal party or conservative one, per se. I firmly believe that our vote must be not for a name but for that political (or person) organization which shows a meritory effort for interest of Canada. To lead Canada based on a rigid ideology or on a superfluous “principles” pigmented with magniloquent speeches to impress, should not be our voting option, regardless of the name of that “party” .     For this reason it is confusing why people voted for Pierre who inherited a deficit of few billions and ended his tenure with a deficit of more than 200  billions and the subservient scribes still consider him a former great PM eluding his strong affiliation to communism, to Stalin, Mao or Castro and his tendency to one party state.

It is also very confusing and sad as well to read or hear: “vote for Liberals” or “vote for conservative” or for whatever or whomever but I never seen a call to “vote for Canada”.     Did we pay attention to the slogan: “ Dump Harper! For fundamental change, Vote communist!” ? Of course . not.

The electorate today is easily seduced and lured by demagoguery and by the false sonority of names meaning nothing – like a dangerous song of sirens .                   Personally I cannot find any rational explanation as how in Canada the young Trudeau became PM or in Alberta a group of an almost political illiterates have been elected , formed a government which pushes the most economic successful province to the brink of a total disaster due to ignorance, lack of a proper education and qualification.

I also noted a phenomenon of a perverted messianism.

The electorate in lieu of applying the real base of democracy, which is meritocracy, they applied the minimum effort and elect persons based on the highest grade of demagoguery combined with the illusory and duplicitous promises of more “free stuff” , less work and more welfare state. Plus fascination for names.                                  In order to impress vulgus the politicians today do not present their plan as how to make Canada better, how to work harder and protect our traditional civilization and culture but they select some fallacious words as children select their preferred toys.  As a result we hear now, almost daily, the sanctimonious sentence “ to protect our Canadian values” – but nobody is able to define them.                                                                       We are embalmed in euphuistic speeches about climate change with its corollary carbon tax, helping he world with its corollary od lax immigration, rights of whatever are today in fashion, from nonexistent sins committed against a fictitious first nation and ending with signs on schools’ toilets.

We witness a time of a total balderdash.

The last and the most dangerous “toy” used by the liberalism, progressivism, etc. is that total ineptitude called globalization.                                                                                            This new verbal histrionic toy looks as an extension of Lenin’s proletarian internationalism, affecting like a deadly virus the minds of those European Arlequins disguised in superfluous global politicians to the extent that they mistranslated upside down the Greek word cosmopolitan into globalism.                                                                   Our cultural forefathers, the Greeks, based their social structure starting with family, extended tribe, city (polis) , country (Greece) and one philosopher , theoretically mentioned idea of “citizen of the world” – cosmo-polis.                                                             The globalization starts in reverse with an undefined “world” and ends up with he dissipation of the country and of the family.

Due to a painful ignorance, the globalists do not comprehend that the Italian Renaissance with all its beauties and discoveries was made by Italians and was not a globalization phenomenon . The great German music of 18th and 19th centuries was not a result of globalization as the French or Russian literature of 19th century was created by French and Russian and not by undefined migrants from all four cardinal points.

We swear allegiance to a national flag and sing a national anthem not global flag and global anthem.

We can have a country, a nation , formed by a combination of races which has a common culture, but we cannot create a nation from a concoction of various habits, tradition disguised as a culture. The result will be a conglomerate of ghettos.

Canada started to look like one.

The tragedy of today’s Canada is that in lieu of accepting some people from other parts of the world with the same or very close cultural backgrounds , in order to totally amalgamate in our traditional cultural fabric and keep our real defined Canadian values which have a background of centuries, our histrionic politicians bring people from geographical zone where the idea of culture doesn’t exist yet or it is in a total contradiction with ours and ask us to lower our cultural value to a much lower level incompatible with XXI century.

The globalism is like a still born child coming from sterile brains of persons pretending to be liberals and open to an internationalist ideas.

It is time for us, Canadians, to stand up and elect only those who will do whatever is necessary to maintain, consolidate and further develop Canadian social culture.

Johannes de Silentio

#45 – A LOVE LETTER

 

                  A LOVE LETTER

We, normal Canadians, are daily aggressed but that political ineptitude called politically correctness, based on a much bigger fallacy expressed as “our diversity is our strength”.

As a result, today it is officially made a concentrated effort to erase our history, our civilization and culture based on the Judeo Christian principles.

This new political toy called “globalization” is not a translation of the old Greek word “cosmopolitan”. In that time the word meant circle model of identity that states that we should regard ourselves as concentric circles, the first one around the self, next immediate family, extended family, local group, citizens, countrymen, humanity.

Now, this new invented word “globalization” starts from entire planet and the result will be the destruction of what we call “country” , “nation” and finally even the family, as we know it, will be dissipated.

More and more it is pushed on our throat idea that “Canadian” is something quaint and everybody ought to be  a hyphenated Canadian.

Yesterday I received a letter from a very good friend of mine, Canadian 100% amid the fact that his hard working ancestors came from a very civilized, Christian country.

I titled it a “love letter” because I feel the love for Canada.

This is the text:

So many letter writers have explained how this land is made up of immigrants. Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people why today’s Canadian is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer.

Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to Canada, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in Halifax or Vancouver and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in both good and bad times.

They made learning English a primary rule in their new Canadian households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home. They had waved good bye to their birthplace to give their children a new and better life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture.

Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labour laws to protect them. Perhaps some were fortunate enough – like my great grandfather – to be given 160 acres of prairie grassland. All they had were the skills, craftsmanship and desire they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity. It wasn’t easy.

Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out.

Canadians – like my uncle Jim – fought alongside men whose parents had come straight over from Germany, Italy, France, Japan, China, Czechoslovakia, Russia, Sweden, Poland and so many other places.

None of these first generation Canadians ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Canadians fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the Freedom as one people.

When we liberated France & the Netherlands no one in those villages was looking for the Ukrainian-Canadian or the German-Canadian or the Irish-Canadian.

The people of Paris and Amsterdam saw only Canadians. And they carried one flag that represented Our Country.

Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country’s flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here.

These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be a Canadian. They stirred the melting pot into one red and white bowl.

And here we are in 2016 with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges, only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules – one that includes a Canadian passport and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country.

I’m sorry, that’s not what being a Canadian is all about. Canadians have been very open-hearted and open-minded regarding immigrants, whether they were fleeing poverty, dictatorship, persecution, or whatever else makes us think of those aforementioned immigrants who truly did ADOPT our country, our flag, our morals and our customs, and left their wars, hatred, and divisions behind.

I believe that the immigrants who landed in Canada in the early 1900s deserve better than that for the toil, hard work and sacrifice of those legally searching for a better life.

I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags, fighting foreign battles on our soil, making Canadians change to suit their religions and cultures, and wanting to change our countries fabric by claiming discrimination when we do not give in to their demands.

It’s about time we get real and stand up for our forefathers rights. We are CANADIANS.

I am a Native of this Country and proud of it!

I want back the country of my birth.

NO MORE POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

P.S. — Please pass this on to everyone you know because later will be too late to right the wrong done by this fallacious globalization and political correctness.

 

 

 

 

#44-Liberalism 101/C

             LIBERALISM 101/C  –  TRUDEAU – ism

Canadian political history, as an extension of Anglo Saxon civilization and Judeo Christian cultural roots, was sheltered from violence which created USA but it received the leftism influence from Europe which was implanted especially after 1848.

As I mentioned in Liberalism 101/B, amid of years when we had liberal PM, generally Canada was very moderate conservative.                                                                                                   One interesting PM was Lester Pearson who acted not as a leftist politician . During his time as Prime Minister, his Liberal minority governments introduced universal health care, the Canada Pension Plan, the Maple Leaf flag and, wisely, kept Canada out of Vietnam War.                                                                                                                                                              Unfortunately he promoted P.E.Trudeau   in his cabinet , grooming him for a future PM. Due to a typical Canadian electorate complacency nobody paid attention to Pierre’s biography, as close to the communist ideology as was possible for a westerner. Look to some few details.                                                                                                                                                      In 1939, Hitler and his ally Stalin signed their Non-Aggression Pact, started World War II and divided Poland between them. Pierre opposed the war, he explained, because, “Like most Quebecers, I was taught to   keep away from imperialistic wars.” Stalin also called it an “imperialistic war,” until Hitler attacked him, which made the war “patriotic” .                                           He also spent some time in the Communist backed Bloc Populaire, helping to undermine the war effort. Like the Communists at the time, he apparently believed Hitler wasn’t that bad. In 1947, Trudeau was a student at the London School of Economics, founded by the Fabian Socialists to train Marxists and spread Marxism. Almost twenty years later, Trudeau, about to become Prime Minister, reflected on his Marxist training and told reporter Norman DePoe that Laski is “the most stimulating and powerful influence he has encountered.”                                                                                                                                     Apparently, he visited Communist Yugoslavia. He was in the Middle East during the first Arab-Israeli war. He was in Shanghai when Mao Tse-tung took over. Now, in Montreal, in 1951, Trudeau and Pelletier began to publish a magazine they called Cité Libre,There was frequent contributor Pierre  Gélinas, Quebec Director of Agitation and Propaganda for the Communist Party. There was Stanley B. Ryerson, leading theoretician of the Communist Party and editor of Marxist Review. Also in 1951, the Communist World Peace Council, and the Communist World Federation of Trade Unions, began planning an international economic conference to be held the next year in Moscow. One of the delegates was Pierre-Elliott Trudeau. Indeed, the fact that Trudeau’s name appears first means he headed the Communist delegation.

Pierre apparently had developed a taste for leading delegations to Communist countries. In 1960 he led another — to Communist China. He participated in a Communist “victory celebration.” He met his idol, Mao Tse-tung. Trudeau describes his meeting with the Communist leaders like this: “… It is a stirring moment: these greybeards, in their ripe old age, embody today the triumph of an idea, an idea hat has turned the whole world upside down and profoundly changed the course of human history.” Of the greybeard who has murdered more than 30 million Chinese, Trudeau says: ”  … Mao Tse-tung, one of the great men of the century, has a powerful head, an unlined face, and a look of wisdom tinged with melancholy. The eyes in that tranquil face are heavy with having seen too much of the misery of men.”                                Everyone knows, I hope, that the Communists summarily rushed to the gallows or to jail millions of innocents. Trudeau not only justifies Mao Tse-tung’s mass murders – he applauds them. They are good, he says. They are necessary. They prove Mao’s genius. Trudeau lavishly admired Fidel Castro, Julius Nyere, and other Third World dictators. Trudeau visited the Siberian city of Norilsk and lamented that Canada had never succeeded in building so large a so far north – unaware, or unconcerned, that Norilsk had been built by slave labor of political prisoners. Looking to Vorkuta where many soviet political prisoners have been exterminated, he allegedly commented that …from here started the future!  The following sentence is a sum of his political thinking: “Each of our countries has chosen a federal system of government … its very complexity is its strength, for it permits the necessary degree of flexibility … We have a great deal to learn from the Soviet Union.” Pierre Trudeau , in line with his previous training, tried to Nationalize Canada’s energy (communism-ized) and he also created Petro-Canada, an organization which proved profit was elusive to big government . But when the government finally took their fingers out of Petro-Canada and privatized it, magically…somehow… this company actually became profitable.                                                                                                                                                                 To keep power, Pierre was very cunning inventing that parlous “multiculturalism” to attract new comers and also, he reduced the waiting period from 5 years to 3 as such at the next elections he had 2 times more new comers, voting en masse for “his party” who gave them an illusion of Canadian identity.

P.E.Trudeau, despite the very ridiculous adulation from ignorant vulgus pushed our society dangerously to the extreme left which started to prove an evident dissipation of our civilization and cultural roots.

Johannes de Silentio

#43 – Liberalism 101/B

                         LIBERALISM 101/B

 

In continuation of the subject called “liberalism” we have to clarify two details:

-The approach is not necessary related to liberal party;                                                                                       – If someone will comment that what is written here is not “original” in this case let me quote few lines from one of my very old “intellectual friend” who wrote “Don’t say that I have said nothing new. The arrangement is new. At tennis both players use the same ball, but one places it better.”

The intention of these pages is to show that the ignorance is not a virtue and the fanatic liberals base their fanatism on ignorance.                                                                                                                 In nowadays people hope that because Liberal comes from the Latin word “liber” – meaning “the free one”, consequential during a government based on liberalism, everything must come free, not only health insurance, education, etc.,but partly including even an income. Liberal should not be a welfare system.                                                                    More anarchic branch of liberalism takes from the ancient Rome idea of disobedience to the civil authority.                                                                                                                                            The residue of this idea can be seen recently in USA under various forms which is spilling in Canada, when we look to this ridiculous idea of “sanctuary cities”. like Montreal and Toronto which is a new form of Trojan horse.

Comparing with liberalism, it was said that “Conservatism is not so much a philosophy as an attitude, a constant force, performing a timeless function in the development of a free society, and corresponding to a deep and permanent requirement of human nature itself” The difference between the conservative and liberal in regards to innovation is that the liberal proceeds after throwing all caution to the wind; while the conservative proceeds in a moderate and cautious fashion , retaining traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization. I have to note that during 150 years of Canada’s existence, the conservatives led the government 66 years while Liberal party was in power for 80 years, especially because of Mackenzie King (22 years) and Trudeau père more than 11 years.        But we also have to underline that without a conservative thinking of Sir John MacDonald, a real statesman, who had at heart the consolidation of a new nation and not the interest of a “party” which is the priority of the liberalism.

 The political history of Canada, comparing with Europe, is quite short. In this context the Liberal party had two main representatives: Mackenzie King, who was PM for almost 22 years and P.E.Trudeau who was PM more than 11 years.                                                                             King was a very strange person, with inclination towards Hitler, towards Stalin as well, anti-Semite, psychological quite not very stable and more.                                                                           In 1937, King visited Germany and met with Adolf Hitler. Possessing a religious yearning for direct insight into the hidden mysteries of life and the universe, and strongly influenced by the operas of Richard Wagner (who was also Hitler’s favourite composer), King decided Hitler was akin to mythical Wagnerian heroes within whom good and evil were struggling. He thought that good would eventually triumph and Hitler would redeem his people and lead them to a harmonious, uplifting future.                                                                        King commented in his journal that “he is really one who truly loves his fellow-men, and his country, and would make any sacrifice for their good”. He forecasted that “the world will yet come to see a very great man–mystic in Hitler. […]but Hitler, him –- the peasant -– will rank some day with Joan of Arc among the deliverers of his people.”                                                                                                   We know now what future was offered by Hitler.\                                                                                         One more example of his blindness regarding Stalin:                                                                            When , in 1945, Igor Grouzenko, cipher codifier at Soviet embassy in Ottawa, defected with a load of documents proving the soviet espionage, King wanted to send him back to Soviet Union, as not to spoil the good relations with Stalin!!!!

Due to the fact that new generations over used the word liberal with its corollary liberalism, it will be useful to analyze the roots of this party and its most preeminent leaders. Without making a long theory, the idea of “liberalism” in Canada, with reference to Liberal Party, it is a liberal socialism, which means a leftist orientation.                            The second pillar of social liberalism in Canada , very much to the left, I would say very closed to a type of crypto communism , is represented by P.E. Trudeau who , without any merit , is still adulated today as a result of public ignorance.

Unfortunately the books about him exaggerate his intellectual prowess and neglect what damage did to Canada his extreme left liberalism, pro communist. His biography is very complicated due to the fact that he made every effort to cover his real convictions: Marxism, Stalin, total government control of everything, especially economy.

P.E.Trudeau liberalism directed to communism deserves a future posting which will come soon.

Johannes de Silentio

 

 

 

 

 

 

#42-Liberalism 101/A

                    LIBERALISM #101/A

A person for whom I have a great respect and a special elective affinity, sent me from Australia a very nice quip referring to me: “everybody has the right to have my opinion” .         It is a very cute witticism but I have to underline a caveat: I do not have opinions because I believe in facts, verifiable, vetted facts.                                                                                               The modesty must be the main characteristics of an intellectual and it is in contradiction with “opinion”. This very overused word was put in circulation by the adepts of political correctness, those who do not have a solid education in the area of which they like to have an “opinion” and they intend to suppress any one who do not agree, based on facts, with their “opinion”.                                                                                                                                                                                        It is a very simple logics that 2 + 2 is four while somebody who maintained that might be in my opinion, three and a half , asserts a fallacy.

On the day of February 17th. in 1600 the astronomer Giordano Bruno was executed by burning because he dare to prove that the opinion of Catholic church was wrong in many aspects. We also have to recall what Galileo Galilei, allegedly said in 1633 when, after torture he had to recant his theory of heliocentrism, against Catholic opinion that the earth is flat : e pur si muove – and yet it moves.

Opinions are not backed by facts but they carry the danger to be imposed by the force of mobs infested with ignorance controlled by leftist ideology or by other antihuman ideologies.                                                                                                                                                                 For reasons which are beyond of any normal understanding, the liberalism invents various empty words like “climate change- with its corollary- carbon tax, inclusiveness, globalization, openness”, guilt of various sins ending in isms, and the most fallacious slogan being that inept “our strength is in our diversity” which is a derivative of ghettoization.

The newest invention in our Canadian political climate is a new word empty of substance : islamophobia. Reading any dictionary we can find that the word, a noun, means dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force. Therefore this new political correct invention did not promote the reducing the freedom of religion.

Why people are confused about Islam?

A very simple explanation can be found in the stories related to the very dangerous , fanatic terrorist, Rahman (recently deceased) who in his “fatwa” he said : …” To all Muslims everywhere: Destroy their countries. [The Americans, Jews and Christians]. Tear them to pieces. Destroy their economies, burn their corporations, destroy their businesses, sink their ships and bring down their airplanes. Kill them in the sea, on land and in the air.”                                                      Sam Harris, known scientist and thinker is very brave when he wrote that “Islam is not a race, ethnicity, or nationality: It’s a set of ideas” and therefore is easy to be “used by cowards, to manipulate morons.”.

Canada, due to liberalism, is not populated by Canadians but by two categories of inhabitants: first nations (whatever means is still debatable) and hyphenated Canadians . This traditional specie – Canadian that is- is replaced with French, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, Italian, Iraqi, African, etc., etc., Canadian.                                                                                                              The nationality of Canadian just disappeared!

Even our Government, under the liberalism , leftist doctrine, is not formed based on meritocracy but based on sex, nationality (meaning hyphenated), skin colour, religious symbols, etc. We are not anymore a nation but a confused social conglomerate.                                             It is not surprising that a hyphenated Canadian wants to have a set of rules to protect a certain ideology against a fictitious “phobia” which , eventually, is provoked by a type of “fatwa” like that one issued by Rahman.

Looking to various terrorists issuing various fatwa, why we do not tabulate motions to protect people against Christianphobia, Jewishphobia (not the same with anti-Semitism), Yogaphobia, Budhistphobia, till ad nauseam. Why not?

This ideological phantasies promoted by liberalism manipulated by an alien ideology, detrimental to the continuation and preservation of our traditional culture and civilization, remind me the stupor of Byzantine synod when Muslim Ottomans already started to enter in the City and they discussed 2 major subjects: how many angels can stay on the tip of a needle and what sex might angels have.?!

How we reached this stage in this area of liberalism  I will try  to clarify in the next part of this posting, which will be Liberalism 101/B.

Johannes de Silentio